![]() (13 is the summation of the Y- values), so 11 will be the Eastings or Dep's and 13 will be Northings or Lat'sĢ.Now you are ready to store in them,so (5000) sto 11 and sto 13 reg's (as a example.) You will only use two of them that is 11 and 13, (11 is the summation of the X- values.) Now you are ready, the statistics registers are 11 thru 16 ( I will list them later with their values.) This hard Key is a gold key above the X to Y, so shift gold and CL acc. First clear all statistics Reg.,this can be done with a hard key or alpha keys. Now Traversing using Statistics Registersġ. Most all RPN calculators can traverse like this or similar in this way. HP 41CX Traverse manually without statistics registers using storage Registersģ.Next key in Azimuth in Decimal of a Degree then ENTERĥ.Next key in P to R., polar to rectangularĪnd no program used, Traversing with the HP41 In manual mode.Manually using keystrokes to Traverse then Inverse. But now I will talk about some of the first steps in using this calculator Printers, wands and many other peripherals. There was a large list of accessories available. There is a very large list of mods available, even extra memory and Quad memory mods. Not just surveyors used theseĬalculators and there MODS. This was a dream come true when surveyors first got their hands on them with the survey Mod Surveying PAC, which plugs into the calculator. In math or programming on the calculator.There may be more data and information or programming than any other calculator sold to the public to this date. This is the most advanced RPN written that consisted of or was using both letters and numerals It was the first time that I had used the alphanumeric RPN calculator. All three of these were used by NASA in the space programs. This was one of my favorite calculators as we all saw the three verisons of it.The 41c,cv,and the cx. Whether or not, if it is the real calculator or an emulator on a device.There are PC's and phone emulators in use today for all types for this calculator. I know there are many of you that have used this calculator in the past and some may still do. In fact, I am about to sell my HP49G because the 35 makes its important functions more accessible while the 49's more powerful functions are better done on a computer.įor the record, I also own an HP17Bii financial, having the same form factor as the H32 and also a real favourite.This is the first discussion I have done since I started this group. However, if you need more power then the 35 is superior, no doubt about it. I recommend the 32 as a great calculator, enormously reliable, fits in your shirt pocket more neatly than the 35 or later models and is functionally capable. The HP32 is a shade narrower, thinner, shorter and thus neater to hold, nicer to press, and has most of the functions of the 35. ![]() The HP35 is functionally superior and is cheaper. The 35S is really nice but today I found the HP32Sii in an obscure place. Over ten years on I lost the next one two weeks ago and bought an HP35S to replace it. Lost it on a plane in the 90s and went out to buy another as soon as I realised the loss could not be recovered. ![]() ![]() Notice that I do not own a 32s or sii.įirst the history: I purchased an HP32 back in 1988, after owning HP25 and HP29C. I own a 12C, a 15C, a 28S, 41CV, 33S (another failure), a 42S, 28s, 48SX, 48GX, a 49G (a backward step, more like backward run with hurdles, for HP), 49G+ (better than the 49G, but still behid the workmanship of 48GX), 35s and a 50G (Someone in HP decided to do somthing good after so many years of failures after the 48GX). I may pay more than $150 for a HP 42s or a 41CX than have way more use than the 33sii. Even the 1980s RPN (again on purpose due to those damn NCEE Nazis) look and operation. I know there are a lot of HP 32s and 33sii lovers out there, but if you need another go and get the 35s. The 33s did not have enough memory back then or today. The HP 35s has a lot of limitations (on purpouse so NCEE approved it) but at least it has more memory than you can really use. If you are looking to buy one for the EIT or PE, you just go ahead and get the HP 35s for $55 to $70. May be for a collector, but for a person that is going to be using it, it is just a plain waste of money. I find it ridicuolous to pay more than $50 in 2010 to own this. If you were going to go for an RPN calculator, you did whatever you need to do to get the HP 28C or HP 28S. Back in 1988 when I was an engineering student, this was not the norm. This was a nice calculator for highschool and highschool math competitions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |